Search results for "Court of Justice of the European Union"

showing 6 items of 6 documents

Consideraciones sobre la cláusula irph a la luz de sus antecedentes y de la doctrina consolidada del tribunal de justicia de la union europea

2021

By issuing its judgment of March 3, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has terminated the last episode in the evolution of the IRPH index to which almost a tenth of mortgages have been referring. in Spain, compared to the rest that the Euribor takes as a reference, declaring in essence that consumers will be able to go to court to declare the abusiveness of the clause that the aforementioned index contains in the deeds of constitution of the mortgage. To understand the scope of the current situation, it is convenient to consider even briefly what the IRPH consists of and the consequences that its application has entailed for the affected consumer borrowers, taking into …

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]declaring in essence that consumers will be able to go to court to declare the abusiveness of the clause that the aforementioned index contains in the deeds of constitution of the mortgage. To understand the scope of the current situationconsumidorthe precedent that In this regardinterés variablelately and until there is any pronouncement by our Supreme Court2020índice IRPHthe most recent resolutions issued by our Courts and Provincial Courts. All these references integrate the content of this work. HipotecaIRPH indexcláusula abusivavariable interest2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730067 Consideraciones sobre la cláusula irph a la luz de sus antecedentes y de la doctrina consolidada del tribunal de justicia de la union europea Castillo MartínezUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASCarolina del Carmen By issuing its judgment of March 3compared to the rest that the Euribor takes as a referenceabusive clausethe Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has terminated the last episode in the evolution of the IRPH index to which almost a tenth of mortgages have been referring. in Spaintaking into account the factual background that led to the issuance of the aforementioned resolutionconsume 504 549they included the conclusions of the Advocate Generalthe content of the STJUE itself andit is convenient to consider even briefly what the IRPH consists of and the consequences that its application has entailed for the affected consumer borrowersMortgage
researchProduct

Failure to make a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union as a violation of Article 6 of the European Conven…

2019

This thesis examines the situation when a national court adjudicating in the last instance refuses to make a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union from the perspectives of European Union law, the European Convention on Human Rights. This situation is analysed in the broader context of the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.

:LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::European law [Research Subject Categories]Court of Justice of the European Union
researchProduct

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo

2021

The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9, 2020 comes to answer the five questions that, in its preliminary question, the Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clauses, establishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16, 2017, in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement and, subsequently, those of April 11, 2018 and September 13, 2018 in the opposite direction, declaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and in…

Carolina del Carmen The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9and its economic repercussion - as well as its procedural significance. -by the consequence of the lifting of procedural suspensions that its dictation supposes2018 in the opposite direction2017consumidorin its preliminary question2018 and September 13cláusula suelothe Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clausesno doubtpacto novatorioagreed as a result of the ruling of the Luxembourg Court-. In this paper I will review the doctrine contained in the STJUE in its comparison with the one previously declared by our Supreme Courtremunerative interestMortgage:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]in attentioninterest variability 132 159consumerestablishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16new agreementsubsequentlyboth to its well-founded substantive relevance - due to the legal doctrine that it consolidates and which results from unquestionable applicationvariabilidad del interés.2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730055 Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo Castillo Martínezdeclaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and insistently commented resolution after its publication2020 comes to answer the five questions thatthose of April 11in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement andin order to conclude what its incidence is with respect to the criterion maintained by our High Court in its Judgments of April 11UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASfloor clauseinterés remuneratorio2018. Hipoteca
researchProduct

Do common constitutional traditions matter in the field of regulated markets?

2019

A new tension is spreading throughout Europe: the tension between Common Constitutional Traditions (CCTS) and Constitutional Identity (CI). Recent cases brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which have gone to the core of European Integration, have revealed this tension. In particular, this tension was highlighted in the “Taricco saga” and in the more recent cases concerning the independence of the judiciary in Poland. The rulings concerning the first group of cases use the concept of CCTS in a quite conventional way, that is, with regard to fundamental rights. The essay examines the possibility that the complex relationship between the CCTS and CI will affect ot…

Settore IUS/09 - Istituzioni Di Diritto PubblicoSettore IUS/08 - Diritto CostituzionaleCommon Constitutional Traditions - Constitutional Identity - Court of Justice of the European Union - European Integration - market regulation
researchProduct

CONCESSIONI DEMANIALI MARITTIME E DIRITTO EUROUNITARIO: LA FINE DEL TEMPO DELLE MORE

2023

Il contributo analizza il frammentario quadro normativo delle concessioni demaniali marittime, lacuali e fluviali con finalità turistico-ricreativa alla luce degli orientamenti della giurisprudenza domestica, con le significative pronunce del Consiglio di Stato e di quella della Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione europea, in particolare della recentissima sentenza 20 aprile 2023 (C-348/22).

The essay analyses the fragmented regulatory framework of state-owned maritime lake and river concessions with tourist-recreational purposes in the Italian legal system in light of the orientations of domestic jurisprudence with the significant pronouncements of the Council of State and that of the Court of Justice of the European Union in particular the very recent judgment April 20 2023 (C-348/22).CONCESSIONI DEMANIALI MARITTIME DIRITTO EUROUNITARIO
researchProduct

The work of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the protection of Human Rights

2023

The work of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the protection of Human Rights. 1. Introduction. 2. The praetorian construction of the Court of Justice on Fundamental Rights. 3. The jurisprudence of the Court of Justice today.

UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Derecho internacionaleuropean union lawprotection of fundamental rightscourt of justice of the european unioneuropean union
researchProduct